“… and as a result the economic and social implications will be even more significant.”
In November 2020, the World Economic Forum (WEF) and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace co-produced a report titled; International Strategy to Better Protect the Financial System Against Cyber Threats. The report warned that the global financial system was increasingly vulnerable to cyber attacks, and one is inevitable.
Advisors to the group that produced the report included representatives from the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the International Monetary Fund, Wall Street giants likes JP Morgan Chase and Silicon Valley behemoths like Amazon, or in other words, Big Finance, and Big Tech – the very groups that stand to gain the most from a clamp-down on privacy and freedom that will ensue after a comprehensive cyber attack.
Interestingly, one of the founding partners is Accenture. Accenture was previously known as Arthur Anderson, a holding company which became infamous in 2002 after it was found guilty of crimes in the firm’s auditing of Texas-based energy company Enron, and was dissolved shortly after. Readers old enough may remember the Enron scandal that basically brought down the stock market. Well Accenture were essentially the outfit behind it, so it’s nice to have some trustworthy people behind the cyber pandemic exercises.
[2020 Cyber Threatscape Report – Accenture, Oct. 2020].
Given that experts have been warning since the last global financial crisis that the collapse of the entire system was inevitable due to central bank mismanagement and rampant Wall Street corruption, a cyber attack would also provide the perfect scenario for dismantling the current, failing system as it would absolve central banks and corrupt financial institutions of any responsibility.
It would also provide a justification for incredibly troubling policies promoted by the WEF-Carnegie report, such as a greater fusion of intelligence agencies and banks in order to better “protect” critical financial infrastructure;
“This requires countries not only to better organize themselves domestically but also to strengthen international cooperation to defend against, investigate, prosecute and ideally prevent future attacks. This implies that the financial sector and financial authorities must regularly interact with law enforcement and other national security agencies in unprecedented ways, both domestically and internationally.”The World Economic Forum (WEF) and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Some examples of these “unprecedented interactions” between banks and the national security state are included in the report’s recommendations. For instance, it argues that “governments should use the unique capabilities of their national security communities to help protect FMIs [financial market infrastructures] and critical trading systems.” It also calls for “national security agencies to consult critical cloud service providers [like WEF-Carnegie initiative partner Amazon Web Services] to determine how intelligence collection could be used to help identify and monitor potential significant threat actors and develop a mechanism to share information about imminent threats”
The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, is one of the most influential foreign policy think tanks in the United States, with close and persistent ties to the US State Department, former Presidents, corporate America and American oligarch clans like the infamous Pritzkers of Hyatt hotels. Current trustees of the endowment include executives from Bank of America and CitiGroup, as well as other influential financial institutions.
It goes on to recommend that “major financial services firms, central banks and other financial supervisory authorities identify a single point of contact within each organisation to engage social media platforms for crisis management.” Orchestrated censorship on social media is also recommended by the report, same we saw during the recent stolen U.S. election; big finance is advised to; “apply lessons learned from influence operations targeting electoral processes to potential attacks on financial institutions.”.
Anyone accustomed to monitoring the the chatter coming out of corporate ‘news’ media knows that it’s quite possible to accurately predict what the DAVOS crowd have in store for us next – the usual media mouthpieces all seem to come out together, and sing the same song, at the same time.
In fact, Charles Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman of the WEF, has told us recently, at last year’s Cyber-Polygon event, in no uncertain terms; a “comprehensive cyber-attack” is on the menu, saying; “The Covid-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyber attack” [video].
As did Jeremy Jurgens, WEF Managing Director: “I believe that there will be another crisis. It will be more significant. It will be faster than what we’ve seen with COVID. The impact will be greater, and as a result the economic and social implications will be even more significant.” [video].
In addition, Johns Hopkins launches a website predicting cyber-attacks, there’s the ubiquitous table-top exercise or simulation just prior to the event, such as we saw with Event201 just prior to the pandemic, but in this case it’s named Cyber Polygon, scheduled for July. Is it safe to presume the attack will be after the event on the 9/July? Perhaps before, as they know we now know these ‘exercises’ have a way of becoming reality. The elites have a set of ‘anti-ethics’ requiring that they tell you what they’re planning, and that’s done in-part via “buzzwords”.
Also, the mainstream media has of late, started chattering in unison, using the same phrases, the same talking points, the same villains (Russia!) – planting those seeds, and pummeling TV viewers with predictive programming;
In this case, we also had a test-run; the Colonial oil pipeline was cyber-attacked recently, shutting it down and creating chaos. In my opinion, it would be wise to stage a few smaller attacks before the big one, as people will be desensitized, and more likely to accept the major attack at face-value.
Such coordinated simulations and warnings from those who dominate the current, ailing financial system are obvious cause for concern, particularly given that the World Economic Forum is well-known simulations about global crisis’s that take place just months prior to the event.
Tying In the Launch of the Central Bank Digital Currency Nightmare;
Recently, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), its kind of the central bank of all central banks, have announced that 80% of banks are actually working on a new central bank digital currency (CBDC).
A CBDC is a crypto currency, digital cash if you will, on a blockchain ledger system, that is issued by, and centrally controlled by one entity, corporate or government. The level of control over every aspect of your life that a CBDC offers the government is frightening, from programable money (think carrot and the stick), to strict KYC and AML regulations, which will effectively end any and all anonymous transacting, such as cash still offers. If you displease your government in any way there is a myriad of ways you can be ‘incentivized’ through digital currencies to ensure you stay on the ‘straight and narrow’.
It’s worth noting a centralized cbdc should not be confused with a decentralized crypto currency, such as Bitcoin, which offers the exact opposite – a reliable, unconfisacatable, uninflatable, unhackable, private store of value. Obviously crypto requires electricity, and it’s prudent to presume the power-grid will be attacked, however, crypto correctly stored (cold storage) can’t be touched by anyone who doesn’t have the ‘keys’, and will still be there when the power comes back on.
With this new financial system so deeply inter-connected to these “credential” efforts, this cyber attack on the financial sector would likely take place at a time when it would ensure the adoption of the new economic system and its integration into credential systems, such as vaccine passports, which are currently being promoted as a “way out” of COVID-19-related restrictions.
A vaccine passport is only an app update away from a full ‘movement passport’.
The most effective and immediate solution to ensure rapid, mass adoption of a CBDC is if the existing system collapses and a cyberattack that brings down the power grid would do just that.
Understand this; the language used, “cyber attack”, “immanent threats” and “malign actors” are euphemisms for you. It’s you (en-masse) they see as a threat, not cyber-attacks, and it’s you this system is designed to ensnare, and not mythical cyber-criminals.
*CBDC’s; The Global Plan to Control Society with Central Bank Digital Currencies – CHI, May, 2021.
*Cyber Polygon event; From “Event 201” to “Cyber Polygon”: The WEF’s Simulation of a Coming “Cyber Pandemic” – Unlimited Hangout, Feb. 2021. [Article]
*Tyrants HATE This 500 Year Old Trick for Ending Tyranny – The Corbett Report, July, 2020 [Video interview]
*Keith Knight of Don’t Tread on Anyone interviews James Corbett about The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude [PDF], the 16th century treatise on tyranny and obedience by Étienne de La Boétie. James and Keith highlight some of the book’s key insights and detail how they apply every much to our situation today as they did when they were written. [Video]
*All Hazards Emergency Kit – list of basic items you may want to store/have at the ready in the case of a “comprehensive cyber attack”. That means no electricity. [Wordoc]