If you’re expecting justice, or to see some huge names outed in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial which began Monday 29/Nov, you may be in for disappointment, but at the same time, little or no real results is nothing to be unexpected. For a moment there I foresaw a steady stream of distraction to keep us from following the case, but that wont be necessary, as it appears the trial will be just a whitewash. And why should we hope for anything else, considering that the nature of her crimes is the most guarded open secret on the planet?

Over the last few days, messages on social media have expressed disgust and skepticism about the fact that the Maxwell trial will not be livestreamed, similar to the way the Kyle Rittenhouse trial was – all we’re given is sketches of people in masks in what could be a courtroom. Not even a photo of her in custody.

While there is no gag order on the trail, the media that will be granted access will be selected, as will what will be reported, and the public will be fed a ‘limited hangout’; admitting—sometimes even volunteering—some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further. We can also expect a narrative sympathetic to Maxwell, which already appears to be on the cards for her defense.

Considering that the trafficking operation touches a shocking number of bankers, hollywood, celebrities, royalty, politicians – huge swaths of elite, presumably all of them being blackmailed by Mossad’s operation of influence headed up by Epstein, how can we believe anything that will be reported? The establishment media that will be allowed in the courtroom are the same people that knowingly covered up the Epstein story for years – it would be naïve to expect the elite to hang themselves by allowing full coverage of just how egregious their global child sex-trafficking ring is. It’s also highly doubtful we’ll hear any of the co-defendants names listed here being mentioned by the msm.

Another red flag is that a federal prosecutor working on the case is the daughter of former FBI Director James Comey. The same James Comey who answers to the Obama/Clinton empires, and the same FBI who ignored multiped reports of Epstein’s abuse, going back as far as 1996. Maurene Comey, an assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, is one of the lead prosecutors in the criminal case against Maxwell, and had been picked to hold a similar role in the case of the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein prior to his ‘death’ in August 2019.

The judge to preside over the Maxwell criminal sex abuse case is U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan. She was appointed in 2011 to the District Court by then President Barack Obama. Prior to that, she served as an associate White House counsel and special assistant to Obama, and later as a special counsel to New York State’s solicitor general.

Earlier in November, following a sudden recommendation from Chuck Schumer, the White House said it had nominated judge Nathan for a federal appeals court post. The White House in an announcement said that if confirmed, Nathan would become the second openly LGBTQ woman to serve as a federal judge. Appointments from politicians who were involved with the defendant seem like a conflict of interest, but if Judge Nathan plays her cards right in the Maxwell case, that big promotion is as good as hers. Nathan will also vet potential jurors for the trial.

In additon, Judge Nathan agreed with Ghislaine Maxwell’s request to keep certain details in the criminal case against her secret, issuing a ruling on redactions that Maxwell had asked for regarding transcripts the government filed under seal last month.

Those portions of the transcript, which were redacted in the civil matter, concern privacy interests and their disclosure would merely serve to cater to a ‘craving for that which is sensational and impure,’” Nathan wrote in the order. I am curious as to the exact legal definition of ‘impure’.

The judge also granted redactions that prosecutors made when filing the transcript. Prosecutors had argued the redactions were necessary to “protect the integrity” of the investigation into Maxwell and to protect the privacy of third parties.

What’s more, in a perversion of justice, Epstein was allowed to strike a secret ‘sweetheart deal’ during his prosecution in 2008. While what he gave up in order to receive a very light sentence for what should have put him behind bars for life is unknown, his four co-conspirators, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff, Nadia Marcinko, and Adriana Ross, lieutenants to Epstein and Maxwell in the grooming operation, were granted immunity. This may extend to Maxwell as well for a large number of the offenses.

There is another little-known fact surrounding the Maxwell family; Ghislaine has two sisters, Christine and Isabel Maxwell, who together created a software program that runs on the intelligence databases of the FBI, CIA, and the DEA. So we have two daughters of Mossad spy Robert Maxwell working for U.S. intelligences, providing software to the FBI to help with counterterrorism, while sister Ghislaine is a massive sex trafficker, and was “captured” by the FBI.
Now, what do you think the chances of a real trial are?

On the surface it seemed we were to be distracted away from the Maxwell trial, however it’s now clear that it will be used as a distraction – feeding the public just enough details to seem as though something is happening, or better yet, drag the trial out, build false hope that household names like Bill Clinton and his ilk will finally see justice and be called out, thus keeping the eyeballs that do pay attention busy while they carry out any of their other evil democidal schemes.

Maxwell indictment [PDF]