The Heretic

Because I want to remain free.

It Came From a Lab;

-It came from a lab, not necessarily Wuhan.
-Download, share, educate others.

  • Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route – Limeng Yan, H.K. University, Sept. 2020. [PDF]
    The alternative theory that the virus may have come from a research laboratory is, however, strictly censored on peer-reviewed scientific journals. Nonetheless, SARS-CoV-2 shows biological characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring, zoonotic virus. In this report, we describe the genomic, structural, medical, and literature evidence, which, when considered together, strongly contradicts the natural origin theory. The evidence shows that SARS-CoV2 should be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template and/or backbone.
  • NIAID’s funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology through Eco Health Alliance 2014-2016 [PDF]
    *This one-page PDF is the smoking gun. The project specifically funded bat coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The funding was done through Peter Daszak‘s EcoHealth Alliance. Total project funding amount for 6 projects; $3,378,896. The PDF has links to details of each round of funding etc.
  • SARS-CoV-2 Prion-Like Domains in Spike Proteins Enable Higher Affinity to ACE2 – George Tetz, Victor Tetz, March, 2020. [PDF]
    Prion-like domains are critical for virulence and the development of therapeutic targets; however, the prionlike domains in the SARS-CoV-2 proteome have not been analyzed. In this in silico study, using the PLAAC algorithm, we identified the presence of prion-like domains in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Compared with other viruses, a striking difference was observed in the distribution of prion-like domains in the spike protein, since SARS-CoV-2 was the only coronavirus with a prionlike domain found in the receptor-binding domain of the S1 region of the spike protein.
  • Wuhan nCoV-2019 SARS Coronaviruses Genomics Fractal Metastructures Evolution and Origins – Jean-Claude Perez, Feb, 2020. [PDF]
    “The main result of this updated release is the formal proof that 2019-nCoV coronavirus is partially a SYNTHETIC genome. We proof the CONCENTRATION in a small région of Wuhan New genome (300bp) of 3 different régions from HIV1 ENVELOPE gene and 3 others from HIV2 and SIV (ENV and POL RT). All this is remarkable and bears the mark of a desire for organization of a human nature: LOGIC, SYMMETRIES”.
    The main result of this updated release is the formal proof that 2019-nCoV coronavirus is partially a SYNTHETIC genome. We proof the CONCENTRATION in a small région of wuhan New genome (300bp) of 3 different régions from HIV1 ENVELOPPE gene and 3 others from HIV2 and SIV (ENV and POL RT). All this is remarkable and bears the mark of a desire for organization of a human nature: LOGIC, SYMETRIES.
  •  Uncanny similarity of novel inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag – Indian Institute of Technology, Acharya Narendra Dev College and University of Delhi, Jan., 2020. [PDF]
    We then translated the aligned genome and found that these inserts are present in all Wuhan 2019-nCoV viruses except the 2019-nCoV virus of Bat as a host [Fig.S4]. Intrigued by the 4 highly conserved inserts unique to 2019-nCoV we wanted to understand their origin. For this purpose, we used the 2019-nCoV local alignment with each insert as query against all virus genomes and considered hits with 100% sequence coverage. Surprisingly, each of the four inserts aligned with short segments of the Human immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) proteins.”.
    *Under massive pressure and threats, the researchers were forced to retract the study, and it is marked so. At that early stage there was a coordinated global effort to cover for China as to the origin of the virus. The study’s findings have been since been confirmed by a Nobel Prize winning French virologist.
  • COVID Pandemic Began at PLA Hospital in WuhanSteven Carl Quay, MD, Ph, Oct, 2020. [PDF]
    Where Did the 2019 Coronavirus Pandemic Begin and How Did it Spread? The People’s Liberation Army Hospital in Wuhan China and Line 2 of the Wuhan Metro System Are Compelling Answers.
  • Shi Zhengli Q&A – Science MagTranscript [PDF]
    The coronavirus research in our laboratory is conducted in BSL-2 or BSL-3 laboratories.
    *Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a.k.a ‘The Bat Lady’, is at the center of Wuhan’s bat coronavirus research. A BSL-2 or 3 lab is not equipped to contain highly infectious diseases. It must be done in a BSL-4 lab.
  • Laboratory Escapes and “Self-fulfilling prophecy” EpidemicsMartin Furmanski MD, Feb. 2014 [PDF]
    This paper presents an historical review of outbreaks of PPPs or similarly transmissible pathogens that occurred from presumably well-funded and supervised nationally supported laboratories. It should be emphasized that these examples are only the “tip of the iceberg” because they represent laboratory accidents that have actually caused illness outside of the laboratory in the general public environment. The list of laboratory workers who have contracted potentially contagious infections in microbiology labs but did not start community outbreaks is much, much longer. The examples here are not “near misses;” these escapes caused real-world outbreaks.”
  • Francis Boyle: Wuhan Corona Virus Is an Offensive BioweaponGeopolitics & Empire, Jan. 2020 [Video Interview, Bitchute]
    *Banned from YouTube, this interview was recorded very early on in the pandemic.
    Dr. Francis Boyle discusses the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China and the Biosafety Level 4 laboratory (BSL-4) from which he believes the infectious disease escaped. He believes the virus is potentially lethal and an offensive biological warfare weapon or dual-use biowarfare weapons agent genetically modified with gain of function properties, which is why the Chinese government originally tried to cover it up and is now taking drastic measures to contain it. The Wuhan BSL-4 lab is also a specially designated World Health Organization (WHO) research lab and Dr. Boyle contends that the WHO knows full well what is occurring.
    Francis Anthony Boyle (born March 25, 1950) is a human rights lawyer and professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law. He has served as counsel for Bosnia and Herzegovina and has supported the rights of Palestinians and indigenous peoples.

%d bloggers like this: