-Download, share, educate others.
- COVID-19: THE GREAT RESET – Klaus (Anal) Schwab, T. Malleret, 2020. [PDF]
- Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development – The Rockefeller Foundation, 2010. [PDF]
*In 2010, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the Rockefeller Foundation, one of Our major “philanthropic” organs, convened what is called a “scenario planning exercise” where future events that we may or may not be planning are “gamed”.
The “Lock Step” scenario is the first of four narratives presented in the Rockefeller Foundation’s summary document, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”. It deals with a zoonotic viral pandemic that wipes out millions across the globe. It’s not that long of a read, so let’s just take a quick walk through it, because it is indeed very eye-opening. The details are worth knowing. Page18 – see any similarities?
- International Strategy to Better Protect the Financial System – The World Economic Forum (WEF) and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Nov. 2020. [PDF]
*The WEF and the Carnegie Endowment co-produced the report. It warns that the global financial system was increasingly vulnerable to cyber attacks. Advisors to the group include representatives from the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the International Monetary Fund, Wall Street giants likes JP Morgan Chase and Silicon Valley behemoths like Amazon.
Given that experts have been warning since the last global financial crisis that the collapse of the entire system was inevitable due to central bank mismanagement and rampant Wall Street corruption, a cyber attack would also provide the perfect scenario for dismantling the current, failing system as it would absolve central banks and corrupt financial institutions of any responsibility. It would also provide a justification for incredibly troubling policies promoted by the WEF-Carnegie report, such as a greater fusion of intelligence agencies and banks in order to better “protect” critical financial infrastructure.
2020 Video of Klaus Anal-Schwab signaling to the world what is to come.
The main “solution” at the heart of this report, and also at the heart of the WEF-Carnegie initiative’s other endeavours, is a call to fuse corporate banks, the financial authorities that essentially oversee them, tech companies and the national security state.
- 2020 Cyber Threatscape Report – Accenture, Oct. 2020. [PDF]
*Accenture was previously known as Arthur Anderson, a holding company which became infamous in 2002 after it was found guilty of crimes in the firm’s auditing of Texas-based energy company Enron, and was dissolved shortly after. Readers old enough may remember the Enron scandal that basically brought down the stock market. Well Accenture were essentially the outfit behind it, so it’s nice to have some trustworthy people behind the WEF’s cyber-pandemic exercises, and they’re also behind the coming Digital Dollar Project.
- How To Opt-Out of the Technocratic State – Derrick Broze, Jan. 2020. [PDF]
“As humanity enters the third decade of the 21st century, we find ourselves at the precipice of a Technocratic Age where Artificial Intelligence (AI), Smart Technology, and the Internet of Things are becoming a part of everyday life. This technology provides benefits but comes at a cost—corporations, governments, law enforcement, and hackers are all capable of peering into our lives at any moment. Corporations and governments are even learning to use technology in a way that allows them to be the “social engineers” of society. The concept of social credit is also becoming increasingly popular, and the likelihood that citizens will face negative consequences for choosing to speak about controversial topics or criticizing authorities is only going to increase.“
*Serendipitously, this was released late January, 2020 – right the penny dropped to most of the world what was about to happen. Never more relevant I’d say.
- THE FIRST GLOBAL REVOLUTION – A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome – Club of Rome, 1991. [PDF]
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” – pg 75.
“Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits. These facts must be faced squarely. Sacrilegious though it may sound, DEMOCRACY IS NO LONGER WELL SUITED FOR THE TASKS AHEAD. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today’s problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time.“ – pg 71.
- The Conspirator’s Hierarchy: The Story of Committee of 300 – Dr. John Coleman, 1993. [PDF]
“At least 4 billion “useless eaters” shall be eliminated by the year 2050 by means of limited wars, organized epidemics of fatal rapid-acting diseases and starvation. Energy, food and water shall be kept at subsistence levels for the non-elite, starting with the White populations of Western Europe and North America and then spreading to other races.
The population of Canada, Western Europe and the United States will be decimated more rapidly than on other continents, until the world’s population reaches a manageable level of 1 billion, of which 500 million will consist of Chinese and Japanese races, selected because they are people who have been regimented for centuries and who are accustomed to obeying authority without question.” (p. 105)
- The Politics Of Obedience: The Discourse Of Voluntary servitude – Etienne de la Boetie, 1577. [PDF]
*Never more relevant;
“They suffer plundering, wantonness, cruelty, not from an army, not from a barbarian horde, on account of whom they must shed their blood and sacrifice their lives, but from a single man; not from a Hercules nor from a Samson, but from a single little man. Too frequently this same little man is the most cowardly and effeminate in the nation, a stranger to the powder of battle and hesitant on the sands of the tournament; not only without energy to direct men by force, but with hardly enough virility to bed with a common woman! Shall we call subjection to such a leader cowardice?
Shall we say that those who serve him are cowardly and faint-hearted? If two, if three, if four, do not defend themselves from the one, we might call that circumstance surprising but nevertheless conceivable. In such a case one might be justified in suspecting a lack of courage. But if a hundred, if a thousand endure the caprice of a single man, should we not rather say that they lack not the courage but the desire to rise against him, and that such an attitude indicates indifference rather than cowardice?“